{"id":"W1502508790","doi":"10.1111/j.1399-3011.2005.00309.x","title":"Synthesis and biologic activity of conformationally constrained analogs of L‐363,301","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Peptide Research","topic":"Chemical Synthesis and Analysis","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Royal Victoria Hospital","funders":"National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases","keywords":"Stereochemistry; Chemistry; Potency; Somatostatin; Receptor; Cyclic peptide; Selectivity; Biological activity; Peptide; In vitro; Biochemistry; Biology; Endocrinology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001441528,0.00006881441,0.000268287,0.000142874,0.00003334589,0.000009534232,0.000172402,0.00009713532,0.0001060108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001223539,0.00005055127,0.0001574392,0.0001338967,0.0003236949,0.000009214674,0.00007540052,0.0001470118,0.000001086377],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001523934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001252934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002066907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001197675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989191,0.0001356944,0.0003816157,0.00009299384,0.0003182866,0.0001522979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986885,0.0002782604,0.0002857235,0.0001217042,0.0005383499,0.0000874507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001291045,0.00007856232,0.001587198,0.00003492669,0.0001393343,0.000001159984,0.00001547736,0.00001947663,0.968036,0.00005019526,0.0004451259,0.02946346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002369698,0.0002157021,0.005202901,0.00004866065,0.00002623836,0.00002562713,0.0001020878,0.0001583801,0.9910417,0.00009875103,0.002786659,0.00005628769],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971118,0.0005726134,0.0002343407,0.0005084254,0.000005070477,0.00003683157,0.00002066911,6.439109e-7,0.001509584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975527,0.001029004,0.001215566,0.00001215639,0.0001056498,7.776994e-7,0.000002289496,0.00000390888,0.00007794086],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02940717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2061421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03658451915226378,"score_gpt":0.340903254040936,"score_spread":0.3043187348886722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}