{"id":"W1502588924","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.03.006","title":"Effect of endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation on refractive outcomes when combined with cataract surgery","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology","topic":"Glaucoma and retinal disorders","field":"Medicine","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Cataract surgery; Ophthalmology; Phacoemulsification; Refractive surgery; Glaucoma; Retrospective cohort study; Refractive error; Significant difference; Surgery; Visual acuity; Cornea; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006467138,0.0002596559,0.0008315737,0.0004695095,0.0003823431,0.0007180034,0.0002786145,0.0004241113,0.002504099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003836983,0.0001064458,0.001774371,0.0004708589,0.0003567478,0.000648656,0.0004305514,0.000754,0.0001640154],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006043046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001144616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002808035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007113365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993774,0.0001618802,0.00008285412,0.00008227241,0.0001355382,0.0001600768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983886,0.0007343508,0.0004313994,0.00007228713,0.00009669969,0.0002766341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.2467371,0.007722488,0.4539098,0.00159652,0.006441375,0.001787942,0.000392288,0.001408457,0.006687168,0.0005862794,0.002104723,0.2706258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003691143,0.04892929,0.9369089,0.0004178594,0.002954857,0.001912891,0.0007708036,0.001135935,0.001310017,0.0004612554,0.001437948,0.00006913004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947166,0.00297924,0.00005779586,0.0002018919,0.0001224868,0.00001494294,0.00009593136,0.000006684355,0.001804496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987464,0.0006992312,0.00009089612,0.00004937169,0.0001093447,0.00001019047,0.00008753091,0.000002653446,0.0002044276],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002808035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008377075,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02408535383841327,"score_gpt":0.2916862548181675,"score_spread":0.2676009009797542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}