{"id":"W1503235120","doi":"10.1108/03068290610683404","title":"Rationality and the language of decision making","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Rationality; Positive economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Preference; Conversation; Value (mathematics); Relevance (law); Epistemology; Originality; Economics; Decision theory; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01844525,0.0007859085,0.001141482,0.002487641,0.002545797,0.00955078,0.00195614,0.002850037,0.003968738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03194103,0.0004928911,0.001191307,0.002659888,0.0416724,0.009481099,0.003519667,0.003430171,0.0008505961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006035193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005819758,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005255897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001938989,"domain_scores_codex":[0.970889,0.02193409,0.001275595,0.001973843,0.002753248,0.001174372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9593538,0.03282497,0.002548443,0.002397369,0.002224286,0.0006510605],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001727904,0.000007438363,0.0001455431,0.00006570875,0.0000119355,0.00004800377,0.001820602,0.001352417,0.00006825504,0.9921774,0.0005812427,0.003704068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009857781,0.000007163151,0.0001020767,0.00007854665,0.000005858818,0.00002596508,0.0004834604,0.001447981,0.00008346908,0.9889464,0.008799209,0.00001012074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09505238,0.02091848,0.3491648,0.07743551,0.0009455755,0.0002390506,0.0003275889,0.0003453568,0.4555712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541747,0.003362924,0.03400755,0.001786172,0.0002699935,0.0001745746,0.00009318222,0.00007595569,0.006054815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01844525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0975489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01446741991810366,"score_gpt":0.2557298401727791,"score_spread":0.2412624202546754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}