{"id":"W1503350191","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01654.x","title":"Testing for poverty dominance: an application to Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Stochastic dominance; Econometrics; Dominance (genetics); Ranking (information retrieval); Statistics; Sampling (signal processing); Range (aeronautics); Normative; Statistical hypothesis testing; Economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Economic growth; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001451915,0.0001862631,0.0004129195,0.0002447214,0.0005578819,0.00008360176,0.0007221262,0.0001442848,0.0001041455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008640054,0.0002281542,0.0001020442,0.0001576485,0.0001041711,0.0004354544,0.00001093393,0.0001714719,0.000004544297],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004669374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01347721,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980717,0.00008501928,0.0006990439,0.0003021843,0.000004700231,0.0008374079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958873,0.0001767298,0.0005096748,0.0003172287,0.0005003269,0.002608705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001326585,0.00002458218,0.03301873,0.00003774525,0.00006788799,0.00003470222,0.0181234,0.0005877923,0.00003539009,0.9140344,0.005315877,0.0285869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001304127,0.001240918,0.02985746,0.0001075282,0.00008748217,0.00009270997,0.01217854,0.001400374,0.0003568149,0.332901,0.6190609,0.001412122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877692,0.00003319098,0.0004183665,0.001657713,0.001612203,0.0004967712,0.0002574117,0.000006410557,0.007748749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918471,0.000006609621,0.002894715,0.003730811,0.001109742,0.00003797908,0.000009010497,0.00003264772,0.0003313993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6137451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991515,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1724633336417691,"score_gpt":0.2338694637924886,"score_spread":0.06140613015071947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}