{"id":"W1503634081","doi":"10.1029/2009wr008712","title":"Influence of wettability variations on dynamic effects in capillary pressure","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Resources Research","topic":"Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Capillary action; Wetting; Capillary pressure; Mechanics; Saturation (graph theory); Contact angle; Materials science; Dynamic equilibrium; Displacement (psychology); Multiphase flow; Geotechnical engineering; Thermodynamics; Composite material; Geology; Porous medium; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009762212,0.0001120102,0.0001672551,0.0003727939,0.00004693653,0.00002610426,0.0003629747,0.0001617032,0.00003175391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002761993,0.00008838888,0.00003284042,0.0002874924,0.0001305229,0.0001138484,0.000108151,0.0009732884,0.000038685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005154124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009493499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002321713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003730053,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998561,0.0001684051,0.0002156928,0.0002183245,0.0004258403,0.0004107417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989205,0.0003863524,0.00001155204,0.0005252011,0.00009525008,0.00006113876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003048494,0.00006787927,0.009812116,0.0005548088,0.00001896468,0.000008697633,0.002023642,0.05325623,0.9320366,0.0001369787,0.00005467092,0.001998929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002030549,0.0001348273,0.1496158,0.0001271348,0.00000338616,0.000001673829,0.00001103461,0.01262619,0.8271338,0.003256291,0.006726271,0.0001604723],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962702,0.00006692657,0.00006262404,0.00003912363,0.00004081887,0.000383168,0.000007191014,0.0001602433,0.002969685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991676,0.00002312008,0.0004635536,0.000005341421,0.00001726287,0.0001196901,0.000004477847,0.00002819992,0.0001707694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1398037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4228508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007579779288428774,"score_gpt":0.2860977517849682,"score_spread":0.2785179724965394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}