{"id":"W1505472321","doi":"10.1002/lary.23906","title":"Radiologic reporting for paranasal sinus computed tomography: A multi‐institutional review of content and consistency","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Laryngoscope","topic":"Radiology practices and education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computed tomography; Consistency (knowledge bases); Sinus (botany); Paranasal sinuses; Medicine; Radiology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04154146,0.0002247504,0.0003683455,0.008544501,0.001253422,0.001827179,0.001350199,0.0003676477,0.000503825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1041946,0.0004208866,0.0004689191,0.01164277,0.001805746,0.0009078705,0.001618124,0.0005014801,0.0001355408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006139011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01545,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06506644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08716869,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9708156,0.009562699,0.007887929,0.0009544222,0.01002613,0.0007531518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7807851,0.04435258,0.05443228,0.01190322,0.1056594,0.002867355],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007613963,0.0000305253,0.9470817,0.0007277704,0.0001079009,0.0001947511,0.003374998,0.00005053327,0.0005707709,0.0001301293,0.002125332,0.04552937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000938902,0.00006428334,0.9845698,0.001154014,0.0002041506,0.0006427147,0.004038089,0.0002462113,0.0006223348,0.00002816756,0.008399545,0.00002115497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.9392751,0.04172869,0.003867436,0.004537245,0.0002956232,0.001507369,0.002652284,0.00008285342,0.006053443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820327,0.01176333,0.003533042,0.0005546053,0.0001090525,0.0003538552,0.00136495,0.00002483761,0.0002635756],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2196949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2706723886140778,"score_gpt":0.4172959969304925,"score_spread":0.1466236083164147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}