{"id":"W1505925542","doi":"10.7202/008089ar","title":"‘To Have Your Cake and Eat It Too?’ Utility, Ecology, Equity and Québec’s New Forest Act, 2001","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de géographie du Québec","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Dominance (genetics); Government (linguistics); Equity (law); Position (finance); Sustainable forest management; Sustainability; Business; Community forestry; Promotion (chess); Natural resource economics; Forest management; Economics; Public economics; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Political science; Geography; Forestry; Finance; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001345795,0.0002527228,0.0001955057,0.0006637796,0.009389454,0.005697286,0.0009450598,0.002897242,0.01877319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003583431,0.0002188511,0.0001786213,0.001379054,0.003767466,0.00143623,0.0009226759,0.002646332,0.001020333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06685824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05551622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987072,0.0001889341,0.00002719585,0.00007872624,0.0004366489,0.0005613086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976896,0.0003966625,0.0001221594,0.0000715167,0.00112612,0.0005939688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007159723,0.0001242799,0.02871726,0.0001295309,0.00002403571,0.0004124279,0.01005578,0.0005470436,0.0004170462,0.3035521,0.591249,0.0646998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003730128,0.00003039458,0.1276844,0.0002533057,0.00001287486,0.0001239722,0.006446519,0.0006045874,0.0002530884,0.007414016,0.8570722,0.00006740336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1020767,0.02193369,0.001288196,0.2917848,0.001064489,0.0001671765,0.00345748,0.00008420442,0.5781434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5505224,0.003834208,0.0008546753,0.01988748,0.0001152354,0.0001011811,0.0006441696,0.00003287604,0.4240077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06685824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4850928,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03633730042601454,"score_gpt":0.2804430228311545,"score_spread":0.24410572240514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}