{"id":"W1506250860","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01835.x","title":"ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Not as the crow flies: assessing effective isolation for island biogeographical analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biogeography","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Insular biogeography; Transect; Geography; Ecology; Archipelago; Bay; Isolation by distance; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006348058,0.0001179368,0.0002392912,0.0003219105,0.000675866,0.00004112437,0.0001642666,0.00007705785,0.0001470976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100244,0.00007560517,0.0005146121,0.001499045,0.0005427194,0.0003013215,0.00003612183,0.0001784183,0.00001477428],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002851776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001227703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000495627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001976601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989676,0.0001085496,0.0003370631,0.000151851,0.0002329711,0.0002019647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988961,0.0005032807,0.0003591925,0.0001101902,0.00007773461,0.00005350149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008524859,0.00008777322,0.9955549,0.0000027394,0.0007156277,0.000006391009,0.0004187321,0.0008401709,0.001181449,0.00006794184,0.0003279903,0.0007110599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005233606,0.0002881627,0.9934751,0.000005944146,0.000580346,0.00005819892,0.0001532686,0.001727108,0.0004623388,0.001434071,0.001190804,0.0001013008],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858238,0.0001883456,0.01227808,0.0009921802,0.0001641684,0.0001784574,0.000009587491,0.00000859912,0.0003568186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973912,0.0001248979,0.002065088,0.0003173692,0.00005639141,0.00001378955,0.000003188514,0.000005411346,0.00002271686],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01156738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5198283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00784083889209902,"score_gpt":0.259433115345368,"score_spread":0.251592276453269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}