{"id":"W1507069233","doi":"10.1111/jopr.12167","title":"In Vitro Wear Behavior of Zirconia Opposing Enamel: A Systematic Review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prosthodontics","topic":"Dental materials and restorations","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Enamel paint; Cubic zirconia; Polishing; Dentistry; Tooth wear; Materials science; Inclusion (mineral); Orthodontics; Medicine; Composite material; Chemistry; Mineralogy; Ceramic","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001581871,0.0001015437,0.0007475484,0.0001085821,0.00002738353,0.00005413782,0.0001949462,0.00006563982,0.00003001867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006613691,0.00007493198,0.0001541232,0.0001265017,0.00003433576,0.0002029828,0.00003587131,0.0001525437,0.00002212587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005037331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004355643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006711084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005398364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979181,0.0003552877,0.001205588,0.00007197859,0.0003247266,0.0001243224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983696,0.00009047807,0.001085776,0.0002008727,0.0001903345,0.00006288405],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005255278,0.0003215939,0.001279918,0.1090195,0.00004496141,0.0002497422,0.0001695475,0.000004385445,0.8878249,0.0003323039,0.0005891921,0.0001113761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004183212,0.00118767,0.01032142,0.3832019,0.003574201,0.009279619,0.00054138,0.0002664423,0.5846347,0.0008498703,0.001069126,0.0008904189],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872535,0.007654715,0.001822771,0.0002409144,0.002008103,0.0008367322,0.00001655168,0.000009106586,0.0001576362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913176,0.0006316332,0.007371889,0.0001596622,0.0001442436,0.0000115952,0.000001694661,0.0000221689,0.0003394659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3031901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3055637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01941758773908082,"score_gpt":0.3076640756326747,"score_spread":0.2882464878935939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}