{"id":"W1507192393","doi":"","title":"Critical length of short fatigue cracks","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gruppo Italiano Frattura Digital Repository (Gruppo Italiano Frattura)","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Crack closure; Materials science; Stress intensity factor; Crack growth resistance curve; Stress concentration; Structural engineering; Stress (linguistics); Crack tip opening displacement; Fatigue limit; Range (aeronautics); Composite material; Mechanics; Fracture mechanics; Forensic engineering; Physics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001775073,0.0004364247,0.0003520796,0.0007603137,0.0003533569,0.0005484623,0.0008770825,0.0009273775,0.004326649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001094163,0.0002896228,0.0005278856,0.0002428711,0.0003822365,0.001071351,0.0003520729,0.00044264,0.0008885781],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005238573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006637308,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002816231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002367456,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998882,0.000009335703,0.000004047743,0.00003748887,0.00004191473,0.00001902613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999611,0.0001593682,0.00006913412,0.00003491406,0.00008463319,0.00004110124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001138073,0.0000760434,0.005831062,0.0002499948,0.00002285729,0.0005037038,0.000206493,0.8256513,0.05664606,0.05965941,0.00354159,0.04749763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006867464,0.00004970388,0.001168564,0.00002543247,0.000007727168,0.0001624765,0.0000192054,0.9808848,0.002542765,0.01262391,0.002495222,0.00001343495],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2477768,0.002804351,0.7084302,0.0004126595,0.0001367355,0.0001488906,0.0007182219,0.001114644,0.0384574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962487,0.0009722451,0.02250957,0.00005495948,0.00004765937,0.0001472532,0.0002434851,0.0001378809,0.01339994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004326649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01447403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01197951819000805,"score_gpt":0.2246705828997425,"score_spread":0.2126910647097344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}