{"id":"W1507354143","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2010.00167.x","title":"The case of ‘losses in any event’: a question of duty, cause or damages?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Damages; Plaintiff; Scrutiny; Tort; Argument (complex analysis); Duty; Event (particle physics); Relevance (law); Appeal; Scope (computer science); Law; Law and economics; Duty of care; Raising (metalworking); Political science; Business; Liability; Economics; Engineering; Computer science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000579518,0.00004927424,0.0001135663,0.00002076138,0.000382882,0.00002073196,0.000130381,0.00002703396,0.00001111901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007619013,0.00003001288,0.00002960556,0.0002280712,0.0005077014,0.000107682,0.00007512973,0.0001124808,0.000002392364],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002106336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007731959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03458256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5067804,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994195,0.00006970928,0.0001891815,0.00008576658,0.0001076425,0.0001282128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992776,0.0003316685,0.0001017469,0.0001352328,0.0001295918,0.00002414724],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003012039,0.0001388345,0.01139412,0.00003675835,0.00005944736,0.00007171823,0.01360877,0.00001044206,0.0008947377,0.9659374,0.0009195614,0.006898074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001145134,0.0002456824,0.09241339,0.0001862095,0.0001498629,0.00006577813,0.1129153,0.0001230211,0.007922121,0.03094739,0.7533907,0.0004954584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.990975,0.0004583549,0.000009969131,0.004452711,0.0001315716,0.0001834071,0.00001057957,0.00001249589,0.003765909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980824,0.0003432914,0.00009368864,0.00001510311,0.00007883837,0.00002996157,2.35681e-7,0.000002909932,0.00135359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.93499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9718462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05253551868424276,"score_gpt":0.4218381476761031,"score_spread":0.3693026289918603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}