{"id":"W1508046885","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4615-4555-2_10","title":"A Case of Institutional Endogeneity? A Study of the Budgetary Reforms of the Government of Alberta, Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"ZEI studies in European economics and law","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Budgetary policy; Fiscal policy; Economics; Latin Americans; Budget process; Government (linguistics); Economic policy; Politics; Public economics; Macroeconomics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003548235,0.0004595809,0.001152025,0.003196242,0.008482933,0.008310932,0.003312217,0.002161486,0.005158916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01814722,0.0005076029,0.0006318372,0.01155874,0.006018496,0.001990978,0.002159816,0.002803672,0.0002158743],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1894168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2338717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989874,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949308,0.0009588401,0.000140086,0.0003486427,0.001113945,0.002507701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867882,0.005214093,0.001612129,0.0005019868,0.004191733,0.001691862],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000663319,0.0004602878,0.330101,0.0004745742,0.0006733678,0.002167404,0.03043183,0.03491057,0.0005736804,0.4908992,0.04935196,0.05929266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003104769,0.0001676462,0.6837049,0.0009112778,0.0008110914,0.000276289,0.1110504,0.02131028,0.00091235,0.05103305,0.1291839,0.0003283079],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8783057,0.01244049,0.001298567,0.03966876,0.0001272202,0.0001989925,0.002769715,0.00007036254,0.06512013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793032,0.003823675,0.0006570551,0.001375651,0.00004801439,0.0000357794,0.0006172583,0.00002851386,0.01411088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8105832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9401616,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03363346854159835,"score_gpt":0.1992100853640429,"score_spread":0.1655766168224445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}