{"id":"W1509883501","doi":"10.1111/nyas.12503","title":"Whole‐of‐society approach for public health policymaking: a case study of polycentric governance from Quebec, Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec; McGill University","funders":"Rockefeller Foundation","keywords":"Corporate governance; Operationalization; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Political science; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Multi-level governance; Work (physics); Regional science; Sociology; Economics; Geography; Law; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002488764,0.0004638912,0.0003903372,0.001449748,0.02017883,0.004769966,0.001882557,0.002126046,0.003573298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005074526,0.000255094,0.0003429809,0.005295446,0.005537485,0.001201989,0.002463546,0.00234282,0.0001830755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.135508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1470549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966938,0.001388461,0.00007176409,0.0002433436,0.000461059,0.001141546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944921,0.002314977,0.0003168969,0.0002417797,0.001319637,0.001314679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003531802,0.0009138812,0.1890626,0.0007468981,0.0002005816,0.03227535,0.4223287,0.009363086,0.003905283,0.1479276,0.07677669,0.1161462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001038333,0.0001960056,0.1324882,0.000860565,0.000109746,0.001771659,0.5761857,0.008495805,0.001042754,0.006800615,0.2717672,0.0001779351],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8965679,0.002225261,0.003392647,0.02920883,0.0001195713,0.0004348265,0.001294896,0.0000622398,0.06669388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842987,0.001002219,0.001773671,0.002304089,0.00001757565,0.00008820738,0.0002152493,0.0000221837,0.01027803],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.135508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9831842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1652190681803741,"score_gpt":0.3591341572766672,"score_spread":0.1939150890962931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}