{"id":"W1511162335","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01679.x","title":"Who produces for whom in the world economy?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":331,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Trade barrier; Economics; Value (mathematics); International economics; International free trade agreement; Economic integration; Regional trade; Free trade; Bilateral trade; China; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3346718483146802,"score_gpt":0.1834345584896731,"score_spread":0.1512372898250071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."},"direct_labels":[],"classifier":{"requested":true,"available":true,"version":"metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90","frame_rows_covered":4299418,"decision_targets":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","randomized_trial","nonrandomized_trial","observational","systematic_review","meta_analysis","case_report","qualitative","simulation_or_modeling","bench_or_experimental","theoretical_or_conceptual","not_applicable"],"score_encoding":"uint16_le_65535","score_resolution":0.000015259021896696422,"interpretation":"Scores imitate each teacher on the enriched screening sample; they are not calibrated prevalence probabilities for the full frame.","warning":null},"prediction":{"classifier_version":"metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90","candidate_union":["observational","theoretical_or_conceptual","not_applicable"],"consensus_intersection":["observational","theoretical_or_conceptual"],"score_encoding":"uint16_le_65535","score_resolution":0.000015259021896696422,"scores":{"codex":{"metaresearch":0.007125963225757229,"metaepi_narrow":0.000030518043793392844,"metaepi_broad":0.000045777065690089265,"bibliometrics":0.002822919050888838,"sts":0.000030518043793392844,"scholarly_communication":0.00019836728465705348,"open_science":0.00030518043793392844,"research_integrity":0.00018310826276035706,"randomized_trial":0.000015259021896696422,"nonrandomized_trial":0,"observational":0.36597238117036696,"systematic_review":0.00018310826276035706,"meta_analysis":0.00007629510948348211,"case_report":0.00006103608758678569,"qualitative":0.000686655985351339,"simulation_or_modeling":0.0014648661020828565,"bench_or_experimental":0.000015259021896696422,"theoretical_or_conceptual":0.9728236820019837,"not_applicable":0.003860532539864195,"design_other":0.0002746623941405356},"gemma":{"metaresearch":0.0007019150072480354,"metaepi_narrow":0.000030518043793392844,"metaepi_broad":0.00009155413138017853,"bibliometrics":0.001007095445181964,"sts":0.0007324330510414282,"scholarly_communication":0.00006103608758678569,"open_science":0.000030518043793392844,"research_integrity":0.0003662165255207141,"randomized_trial":0.000015259021896696422,"nonrandomized_trial":0.000015259021896696422,"observational":0.08902113374532693,"systematic_review":0.00009155413138017853,"meta_analysis":0.000030518043793392844,"case_report":0.00006103608758678569,"qualitative":0.00009155413138017853,"simulation_or_modeling":0.0009918364232852674,"bench_or_experimental":0.000015259021896696422,"theoretical_or_conceptual":0.7504539559014267,"not_applicable":0.1006637674525063}},"interpretation":"Scores imitate each teacher on the enriched screening sample; they are not calibrated prevalence probabilities for the full frame."}}