{"id":"W1511219822","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2008v33n1a1928","title":"Political Marketing Canadian Style? The Conservative Party and the 2006 Federal Election","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Federal election; Primary election; Politics; Realigning election; Split-ticket voting; Political science; Preference; Polarization (electrochemistry); Style (visual arts); General election; Perception; Duverger's law; Political economy; Public administration; Economics; Law; Psychology; Socialism; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002542764,0.00005530587,0.0001105831,0.00006480309,0.002697474,0.0001179444,0.0002479268,0.00006077465,0.00005043396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001258212,0.00003517489,0.00004172281,0.0001590593,0.001052487,0.0001648749,0.000005888593,0.0002822398,0.00000437264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003871802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00230391,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9317705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9883116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973133,0.00189026,0.0002345107,0.00004424465,0.0001524077,0.000365332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979424,0.0008879713,0.0001426122,0.0001514727,0.0002931545,0.0005823498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004131403,0.000005711602,0.21044,0.000003352083,0.00003721623,0.000005532728,0.01187634,0.000005235633,0.000003492224,0.7602718,0.01644407,0.0008659607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007633764,0.00004918339,0.6961544,0.00008210972,0.0000425191,0.0001224592,0.007128347,0.0003141993,0.00001687745,0.01770152,0.2774538,0.0001711993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7384873,0.001326456,0.00004648574,0.2061467,0.0001873933,0.0003121949,0.00001018528,0.000006084391,0.05347718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979684,0.00004420864,0.00002495476,0.001424973,0.0001548167,0.000005454311,0.000002075091,0.00000443013,0.0003706899],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7425702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04667614955237474,"score_gpt":0.3077650741027798,"score_spread":0.261088924550405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}