{"id":"W1513101566","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.7231","title":"AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE NEW AGRICULTURAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS: A NONLINEAR IMPERFECTLY COMPETITIVE SPATIAL EQUILIBRIUM APPROACH","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Economics; International economics; International trade; Tariff; Free trade; Trade barrier; Commercial policy; Comparative advantage; Liberalization; Partial equilibrium; Market access; Agriculture; General equilibrium theory; Microeconomics; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00218052,0.0006869671,0.0009362199,0.0007568568,0.0006803838,0.002638227,0.001720994,0.001717732,0.006218716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006041036,0.0004954795,0.001160002,0.0009902857,0.001451904,0.003430194,0.001408025,0.001302802,0.0002849441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004894761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00229919,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02947738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01502549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987042,0.0008406675,0.00003788253,0.000107586,0.0001900873,0.0001195452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973783,0.001723137,0.0002682607,0.0001593301,0.0003398744,0.0001310671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001992631,0.00001663974,0.0003040975,0.00001191646,0.000007386094,0.0000337671,0.00001711359,0.9796906,0.0000770732,0.0190691,0.0000909042,0.0006614566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008879576,0.00002333572,0.0001299145,0.00000288303,0.000003346185,0.000005149594,0.00003649682,0.995358,0.00004113545,0.004074218,0.0003120347,0.000004614693],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6714579,0.0004296746,0.200397,0.002216597,0.00008585153,0.0002699816,0.001130567,0.0001338232,0.1238785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827481,0.0001731069,0.01199089,0.00006933962,0.00001441621,0.00008789456,0.0001633069,0.00001796598,0.004734959],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02947738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05861163,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0805484129295207,"score_gpt":0.2432511896762647,"score_spread":0.162702776746744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}