{"id":"W1513300606","doi":"10.1002/2013gl057919","title":"Are scale‐invariant stress orientations related to seismicity rates near the San Andreas fault?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysical Research Letters","topic":"earthquake and tectonic studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"San andreas fault; Geology; Induced seismicity; Scaling; Scale invariance; Amplitude; Seismology; Slip (aerodynamics); Magnitude (astronomy); Nonlinear system; Fault (geology); Invariant (physics); Orientation (vector space); Stress (linguistics); Geodesy; Geometry; Physics; Statistics; Mathematics; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003578518,0.0001865962,0.0002449053,0.0007719359,0.00015563,0.0006618435,0.0002636643,0.0003887795,0.001227885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032031,0.000338272,0.0001717079,0.00087017,0.001071336,0.0008764981,0.0002506992,0.0002804507,0.0003326693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000350084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001737738,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005513119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005308457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998017,0.0000345675,0.00001527285,0.00007144986,0.00002889838,0.00004821311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979425,0.0003411145,0.001210119,0.0001829621,0.0001543758,0.000168846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001394238,0.00005085178,0.9496561,0.00005066198,0.0001110074,0.0002561571,0.0004065176,0.004172907,0.02461542,0.001806361,0.0002611478,0.0184734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000364928,0.00001536932,0.9955089,0.000003735292,0.000007809892,0.00008802803,0.0001357156,0.002903817,0.0006291779,0.0005800878,0.0001103816,0.00001331153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970054,0.0001404275,0.001533241,0.0001322057,0.000006137361,0.000003936946,0.00007996315,0.00002275228,0.00107602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996583,0.00006405522,0.0001196111,0.00001000727,0.000005790774,0.000001525496,0.00003024445,0.000003773375,0.0001065254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005513119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01096207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03112784037338771,"score_gpt":0.2929307009890031,"score_spread":0.2618028606156154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}