{"id":"W1514360038","doi":"10.1080/14634988.2013.826115","title":"Microbial foodweb comparison of the Laurentian Great Lakes during the summers of 2001–2004","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Picoplankton; Microbial loop; Trophic level; Phytoplankton; Autotroph; Biomass (ecology); Heterotroph; Bacterioplankton; Environmental science; Plankton; Trophic state index; Ecology; Productivity; Mixotroph; Biology; Nutrient; Bacteria","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000838114,0.0002224,0.0004969842,0.00004599949,0.0003029264,0.00002941425,0.0007226315,0.00005561364,0.001245028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001336145,0.000136614,0.0001487797,0.0003490827,0.000100872,0.0001022629,0.0003086715,0.0001398724,0.0003252256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003086899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002657168,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005248403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04073029,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971699,0.0003209369,0.001139172,0.0003084239,0.000556362,0.0005052324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979934,0.0000994611,0.0009476463,0.0008328577,0.00001321606,0.0001134256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003922829,0.0006239843,0.8471693,0.008292659,0.0004991506,0.000002879846,0.006398166,0.01941455,0.0007321252,0.002710482,0.1040595,0.01005795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004260475,0.0006441599,0.6858884,0.003700618,0.0004001339,0.00003006967,0.01557946,0.2298982,0.00122653,0.001215543,0.05581751,0.001338931],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907283,0.0002356966,0.0003840037,0.001551324,0.000539421,0.002637932,0.00003180126,0.0000214941,0.003869982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980117,0.0000286068,0.0003276579,0.0001506057,0.00003079094,0.00009115287,0.000009052229,0.00002111703,0.001329328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2104836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996679,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01172920704110679,"score_gpt":0.2376951872601383,"score_spread":0.2259659802190315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}