{"id":"W1514797816","doi":"","title":"An Evaluation of a Dialogic Book-Reading Program for At Risk Children","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Shared reading; Vocabulary; Dialogic; Literacy; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Narrative; Test (biology); Developmental psychology; Linguistics; Pedagogy; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001798971,0.0008266332,0.0007470634,0.0008175806,0.001024307,0.000424851,0.001399373,0.0009474214,0.002539676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003287458,0.0003274716,0.001053237,0.0005442387,0.0004170445,0.0005104158,0.0009636608,0.0009774016,0.0002106088],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000672612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002284995,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005074516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007946474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983808,0.0008087773,0.0001140402,0.0001876536,0.0002788029,0.0002299588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978255,0.0006989877,0.000176284,0.0000826403,0.0001718001,0.001044849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.06864406,0.3616649,0.01979563,0.004398606,0.0006739022,0.003470265,0.008994703,0.002832811,0.02188165,0.0005843143,0.001638614,0.5054204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0543111,0.7259663,0.1954438,0.0005008914,0.0008348751,0.0009200497,0.003697729,0.002824493,0.009986421,0.000321305,0.005082368,0.0001105527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997641,0.0001575359,0.0002560581,0.00005647093,0.00002498451,0.001044952,0.0001084134,0.00005104,0.0006595865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873218,0.0009138973,0.006474825,0.0001025253,0.00006040662,0.003342866,0.0003881793,0.00001909252,0.001376455],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005074516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01008999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02039059649473943,"score_gpt":0.2965233278380084,"score_spread":0.276132731343269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}