{"id":"W1515361935","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i2.3530","title":"The Ethics of Argumentation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Rationality; Epistemology; Normative; Heuristics; Dialectic; Defeasible estate; Reflective equilibrium; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008084402,0.00005346673,0.00007170098,0.00001618009,0.0003331681,0.00003216398,0.00009629904,0.00005714556,0.0001148813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001002241,0.00003169502,0.00004840162,0.0000124668,0.0004246422,0.0003137415,0.00002449111,0.0002518001,0.0001041222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005710745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002345569,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005880947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001321873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994394,0.00004501766,0.000188913,0.00002820576,0.0001293088,0.0001691313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993469,0.0003034553,0.0001172106,0.0001023918,0.0001045272,0.00002552242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006117608,0.00001335895,0.0004317161,0.00002064233,0.00001123309,4.805449e-8,0.05184823,0.000002069447,0.0000125602,0.9456443,0.0003491482,0.001660558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001497612,0.00009688486,0.002266817,0.000008819869,0.00002302644,0.000001721963,0.0145876,0.00001514779,0.000614747,0.03147288,0.9506652,0.0000973959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1260574,0.000781577,0.0001693065,0.002059675,0.002760199,0.0001733657,0.00001477946,0.0000508051,0.8679329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942655,0.00007369796,0.00006609481,0.001211953,0.0004132683,0.000005919668,0.000008076855,0.000003290989,0.003952191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9503161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2562494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.142806360112295,"score_gpt":0.3259176381388368,"score_spread":0.1831112780265419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}