{"id":"W1516702566","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.510","title":"Defeasibility in Judicial Opinion: Logical or Procedural?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Defeasible reasoning; Appeal; Dialectic; Argumentation theory; Adversarial system; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Variety (cybernetics); Judicial opinion; Subject (documents); Computer science; Defeasible estate; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005867282,0.0001710842,0.0006094776,0.0001724796,0.0001648373,0.00004165951,0.0003149469,0.0002357864,0.0009464433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002654814,0.0001820699,0.0001419953,0.0002627337,0.0002462585,0.0005803178,0.00009859239,0.0002143741,0.001820544],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001615824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008243221,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006911951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003205744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977998,0.00001389667,0.001253042,0.0003843509,0.00004423226,0.000504748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991556,0.00004903702,0.0003525504,0.0002839332,0.00002744993,0.0001313622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002764289,0.0001857612,0.5486348,0.00006038991,0.00002075917,0.0000375435,0.001127911,0.0001869061,0.000001009363,0.4466907,0.002313713,0.0004640356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002635285,0.0006187982,0.7474424,0.00003639032,0.000002477748,0.0002374992,0.0002452651,0.001419827,0.00002018183,0.1577228,0.08870358,0.0009155638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6654913,0.0004752731,0.0002622632,0.0004373851,0.001340636,0.000544133,0.00007187266,0.00009836494,0.3312788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970578,0.0002833238,0.0001811205,0.001476948,0.0005293943,0.00004526224,0.00002037591,0.00001285147,0.0003929366],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3315665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999668,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1017084201058111,"score_gpt":0.2575299717280949,"score_spread":0.1558215516222838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}