{"id":"W1516702566","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.510","title":"Defeasibility in Judicial Opinion: Logical or Procedural?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Defeasible reasoning; Appeal; Dialectic; Argumentation theory; Adversarial system; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Variety (cybernetics); Judicial opinion; Subject (documents); Computer science; Defeasible estate; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02764557,0.0006118045,0.001447167,0.00300744,0.003006332,0.01264555,0.003253,0.009272362,0.006284283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0780868,0.0007919355,0.001702626,0.002440921,0.04751887,0.02679223,0.005320206,0.009569598,0.001190333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003368471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002719026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009522408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000701974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9722453,0.01475658,0.002021709,0.003081518,0.006108824,0.001786176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9358347,0.04086811,0.008752144,0.007993517,0.005279718,0.001271869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001102587,0.00001391992,0.000267,0.00004243273,0.00001107874,0.00006222811,0.001536042,0.0001688692,0.0001067765,0.9946929,0.0002870747,0.002800638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001093967,0.00001279595,0.0002723774,0.00006232757,0.000008041473,0.00007675288,0.0004753827,0.000629192,0.0001100657,0.9953329,0.002997071,0.00001204096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1123809,0.009408125,0.5229124,0.0919448,0.0009588638,0.0002533492,0.0002263306,0.0002975945,0.2616176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679741,0.001388367,0.02326585,0.00261231,0.0007141024,0.0001664788,0.0000803681,0.00006859082,0.003729702],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02764557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1462055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1017084201058111,"score_gpt":0.2575299717280949,"score_spread":0.1558215516222838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}