{"id":"W1517538723","doi":"10.1111/pirs.12076","title":"Wealth redistribution in urban land development under a dual land system: A case study of Beijing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papers of the Regional Science Association","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Redistribution (election); Land value; Value (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Agricultural economics; Economics; Land tenure; Land use; Land development; Market value; Natural resource economics; Business; Geography; Market economy; Agriculture; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001204869,0.00005043924,0.0001068017,0.00001365976,0.0003134632,0.00001456104,0.000129484,0.00003970684,0.000001535496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004626807,0.00001051602,0.00002756366,0.0003908184,0.00005144444,0.00007212935,0.00004154687,0.00004868271,4.115477e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002576135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003836156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002150608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006814645,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989922,0.00007093974,0.0001964054,0.0001284831,0.0004662589,0.0001457279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995167,0.00008356855,0.0002613076,0.00003338015,0.0000730894,0.00003195938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001222072,0.000200794,0.9870477,0.00001223707,0.00001195755,0.000002398346,0.001360133,0.00009545891,0.007481168,0.0004653113,0.00002366591,0.003286966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002631402,0.0001065796,0.995382,0.00004812723,0.000007271708,0.0000199448,0.003097092,0.0002193634,0.000229478,0.00005724728,0.0005108146,0.0000589766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987849,0.000005803007,6.605452e-7,0.0007497082,0.000077083,0.0001464866,0.000002730497,0.000005884285,0.0002267633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998375,0.000002159828,0.000006767732,0.00001519309,0.00004938547,0.000003358976,0.000003599611,2.415441e-7,0.00008183579],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008334275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3802732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01520299731858734,"score_gpt":0.2224161380190485,"score_spread":0.2072131407004612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}