{"id":"W1518421111","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1305","title":"Conditional conservatism and persistence of accrual components","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Accrual; Conservatism; Accounting; Actuarial science; Economics; Humanities; Political science; Earnings; Philosophy; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009366751,0.0002413586,0.0004149406,0.002402982,0.0004367387,0.002105073,0.0006064524,0.0005481244,0.002170568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09858677,0.0002606721,0.0005121625,0.002080448,0.001319233,0.001445864,0.001439255,0.001298322,0.0002333304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008380198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005721516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003792614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002415058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965355,0.0008969331,0.0006940587,0.000681059,0.0008566288,0.0003358026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6988103,0.1238766,0.1301472,0.03056263,0.01270934,0.003893924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001792086,0.0000360369,0.9868197,0.00001660709,0.0001257088,0.00007147989,0.0003507335,0.003128335,0.0006505054,0.0007189121,0.00009883537,0.007803951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005758114,0.00006777968,0.9895766,0.00001342376,0.00002963838,0.0001273995,0.0001503384,0.006450624,0.0005490452,0.002773864,0.0002355338,0.00002002368],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971795,0.0001240129,0.001730768,0.0001280068,0.000004214014,0.000006290999,0.0001719842,0.0000280252,0.0006271268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996608,0.000009202347,0.0001480446,0.000004829156,0.000005386532,0.000001221281,0.00008268617,0.000002722511,0.00008505048],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009366751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04953671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1385761329754457,"score_gpt":0.2911053534954139,"score_spread":0.1525292205199682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}