{"id":"W1518630739","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01684.x","title":"Testing the growth limitation hypothesis for subarctic Scots pine","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecology","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Maj ja Tor Nesslingin Säätiö; Suomen Kulttuurirahasto","keywords":"Scots pine; Tree line; Subarctic climate; Shoot; Sink (geography); Nutrient; Biology; Betula pubescens; Carbon sink; Botany; Pinus <genus>; Horticulture; Agronomy; Ecology; Climate change; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001416687,0.0003353342,0.0002412041,0.0002603112,0.0001895966,0.0002782288,0.0002593567,0.0002260802,0.002465387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001878937,0.00008536099,0.000264469,0.0001291133,0.0004659113,0.0002699469,0.0002173904,0.0003104317,0.0002074908],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002572857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002514842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004308706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004824364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997883,0.00008832933,0.00001549899,0.00004878157,0.00002820075,0.00003085336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960704,0.002704045,0.0005739268,0.000159251,0.0001823867,0.0003100213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001515473,0.0001585023,0.9589075,0.000137228,0.0002083022,0.0004609794,0.0002355022,0.001099208,0.03013952,0.0003363964,0.000178074,0.006623307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005270114,0.0009522967,0.9905186,0.000009753465,0.0001004555,0.0002131193,0.0005149321,0.002655091,0.004071697,0.0005574074,0.0003469777,0.000006883203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989103,0.00009649359,0.000379188,0.00003714288,0.000004994288,0.000005243722,0.00007166214,0.000006148067,0.0004887733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993744,0.00003396249,0.0002253108,0.00006201801,0.000006608765,0.000008898623,0.00012867,0.000001693076,0.0001584228],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004308706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008567214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02125330775931623,"score_gpt":0.2125737318141754,"score_spread":0.1913204240548591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}