{"id":"W1518630739","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01684.x","title":"Testing the growth limitation hypothesis for subarctic Scots pine","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecology","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Maj ja Tor Nesslingin Säätiö; Suomen Kulttuurirahasto","keywords":"Scots pine; Tree line; Subarctic climate; Shoot; Sink (geography); Nutrient; Biology; Betula pubescens; Carbon sink; Botany; Pinus <genus>; Horticulture; Agronomy; Ecology; Climate change; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003994689,0.00003969252,0.00007084518,0.00002621273,0.00008637468,0.00001252319,0.0001278353,0.00004324507,0.00007504407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007011448,0.00002482055,0.00003761719,0.00007457424,0.00005828286,0.00009245495,0.00002046855,0.0001420028,0.00002290379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002911695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001225965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008310763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001860001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999591,0.0000232463,0.0001692948,0.00004831443,0.00006740557,0.0001007751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990838,0.00063004,0.0001787876,0.00005062013,0.00002723685,0.00002956353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003835893,0.0001240037,0.775153,0.00000802837,0.00003603884,0.00001324332,0.0002682612,0.005300576,0.2070467,0.001173599,0.001207455,0.009630783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002796612,0.0001679977,0.967997,0.00000299315,0.00003813956,0.0003056767,0.00001626808,0.01467438,0.0003229828,0.01522549,0.0009151485,0.00005430925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970202,0.000002901903,0.000367354,0.001510322,0.0002340212,0.00006785036,0.000001498578,0.000002705397,0.0007931229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897956,0.000003435755,0.009882605,0.000159113,0.00007522477,0.000003077162,5.280551e-7,0.000004236494,0.000076224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2067237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1012153,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02125330775931623,"score_gpt":0.2125737318141754,"score_spread":0.1913204240548591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}