{"id":"W1518832762","doi":"10.1139/x06-274","title":"Double sampling may improve the efficiency of litterfall estimatesContribution No. 2335 of the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station, Durham, N.H.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plant litter; Biomass (ecology); Litter; Environmental science; Sampling (signal processing); Sorting; Botany; Agronomy; Ecology; Mathematics; Biology; Ecosystem; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009014685,0.001180049,0.001909993,0.002131203,0.0008070413,0.0009763449,0.001538717,0.0008333272,0.009616988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01015581,0.0008712524,0.0006023475,0.001551683,0.0004826657,0.001038867,0.001161087,0.0008968785,0.002812858],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001455137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001623252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02630574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1761803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940112,0.002555683,0.0004373851,0.00147128,0.00125599,0.0002684675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817888,0.007949274,0.002547372,0.00346016,0.00345185,0.0008026269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005016242,0.003583451,0.1798446,0.001403259,0.0005886214,0.0003675519,0.0006466074,0.005068228,0.25958,0.00167541,0.02109001,0.521136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001069944,0.004163062,0.8117978,0.0002639952,0.0004980585,0.0006727806,0.0003697277,0.04096989,0.07699638,0.004084111,0.05881352,0.0003006992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4278372,0.002246296,0.5305583,0.0009009015,0.0009067403,0.006878239,0.01078602,0.004077537,0.01580865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2963169,0.0006419172,0.6717559,0.001006406,0.0002319457,0.007504601,0.006579438,0.0006864335,0.01527661],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02630574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05230522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02701516688698272,"score_gpt":0.3050958445856188,"score_spread":0.2780806776986361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}