{"id":"W1519716147","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4499","title":"The Merits of “Merits” Review: A Comparative Look at the Australian Administrative Appeals Tribunal","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Adjudication; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Enforcement; Legitimacy; Administrative law; Law; Independence (probability theory); Judicial review; Legislation; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06483009,0.0002310764,0.001337893,0.01694289,0.005438138,0.01370955,0.001851224,0.00537836,0.004536803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15848,0.0005718074,0.0009231907,0.01285684,0.006731551,0.007196915,0.004505422,0.002755161,0.0005454489],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01700875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02596638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03589277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.113777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9360927,0.0297036,0.004523543,0.001816355,0.0240299,0.003833924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8562701,0.08557827,0.009974626,0.00314928,0.04103471,0.003993005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006492558,0.0001747049,0.0167962,0.01054047,0.000463678,0.002256843,0.02727712,0.0009188585,0.001168139,0.5047197,0.1138198,0.3212153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001286845,0.0005448919,0.07267599,0.007460241,0.0005336586,0.001202594,0.0109951,0.0005185109,0.0003342976,0.02884952,0.8766336,0.0001228956],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06257676,0.4766691,0.001877974,0.1488348,0.006313159,0.0002953227,0.0001789818,0.00004555983,0.3032083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7049684,0.1937348,0.002748782,0.06589202,0.008861869,0.0003291971,0.0002324363,0.00008055729,0.0231519],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06483009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3428584,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1242210924432735,"score_gpt":0.4465505210113872,"score_spread":0.3223294285681137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}