{"id":"W1519976071","doi":"10.1109/isscs.2015.7203985","title":"An automated power estimation and optimization methodology","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Low-power high-performance VLSI design","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Power optimization; Design flow; Computer science; Electronic design automation; Electronic system-level design and verification; Automation; Computer engineering; Power (physics); High-level synthesis; Abstraction; Dynamic demand; Reliability engineering; Embedded system; Field (mathematics); Power consumption; Field-programmable gate array; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006778522,0.001197153,0.0007259494,0.001262593,0.0005126257,0.0008944231,0.001136231,0.0005510697,0.004261955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002300563,0.0005351372,0.0008264533,0.0009391888,0.0004877748,0.001095987,0.0007312556,0.000865327,0.0008390436],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000687475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001788447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002859005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040687,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988598,0.0002618072,0.00006084422,0.0001772635,0.0005500444,0.00009029763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990863,0.0004253877,0.00009247634,0.0001718062,0.000211094,0.0000131191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006179107,0.0001117103,0.0007693449,0.0001729838,0.00005091527,0.0001131515,0.0000794058,0.4571739,0.02086864,0.02645531,0.003137428,0.4910055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002513681,0.00005715526,0.0002923678,0.00001511318,0.00002106938,0.00006727108,0.00001341005,0.9738362,0.008394787,0.01236536,0.004898308,0.00001380873],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002632038,0.00006763069,0.9946104,0.00004396333,0.000007283732,0.00004723274,0.00004021479,0.001005221,0.001545974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1497745,0.0001745227,0.8458627,0.00009844515,0.0000296847,0.000264043,0.0002741729,0.000262617,0.003259275],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004261955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01425761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04059328220421316,"score_gpt":0.3013295975172047,"score_spread":0.2607363153129916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}