{"id":"W1521499787","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.774841","title":"Moral coherence and value pluralism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Pluralism (philosophy); Moral reasoning; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Norm (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":{"n_in":0,"stratum":"aff_core","weight":5595.2375,"opus":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"medium","reason":"Philosophy paper on moral coherence, systematicity, and value pluralism; scientific reasoning appears only as an analogy, so the object is moral epistemology rather than research practice."},"gpt":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"This philosophical paper concerns moral reasoning and only uses scientific reasoning as an analogy, not as its object."},"grok":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"Moral philosophy on value pluralism and coherence; science is only an analogy, not the object."}},"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02323963,0.0004168838,0.000840231,0.00171628,0.007537179,0.009679871,0.00121585,0.004654918,0.003128038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02788845,0.000403677,0.0008417472,0.001495756,0.05807825,0.01475253,0.009567109,0.007089084,0.0004750931],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006133457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005161878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001916238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001493729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9648204,0.02395635,0.0009453147,0.002600373,0.005824068,0.001853547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788632,0.01219932,0.001962448,0.002753138,0.003071751,0.001150127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004276775,0.000005086081,0.00007915442,0.00001616182,0.000003606104,0.00001379083,0.001586048,0.00009492021,0.00004369626,0.9959762,0.0003851927,0.001791932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007172248,0.000005834868,0.0000625606,0.00002708415,0.000002353798,0.00001375533,0.000435795,0.0001959171,0.00005090809,0.9934601,0.005734459,0.000004091401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1149872,0.007993259,0.2212854,0.166644,0.001092334,0.0001315491,0.00008668217,0.0001290897,0.4876506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792677,0.0006131026,0.0114113,0.003320331,0.0004548889,0.00008486015,0.0000207816,0.00004707197,0.004779866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02323963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1065935840731182,"score_gpt":0.4063576546038145,"score_spread":0.2997640705306964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}