{"id":"W1521545449","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.18752","title":"JOINT FOREST MANAGEMENT IN INDIA: ASSESSMENT OF PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION OF IMPACTS","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Environment; Ministry of Environment and Forests; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Joint Forest Management; Forest management; Context (archaeology); Pace; Scope (computer science); Government (linguistics); Certified wood; Geography; Business; Community forestry; State forest; Environmental resource management; State (computer science); Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Forestry; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002031304,0.0001661142,0.0003457998,0.0003678343,0.00009782102,0.000009700791,0.0003594915,0.0001291354,0.00101681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001106313,0.0001985352,0.00008820656,0.0002962657,0.0004109497,0.0001677525,0.001637353,0.000221226,0.00001080594],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004008065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006725719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002233453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001304438,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979155,0.0002336611,0.000260937,0.0003997836,0.0009582638,0.0002318306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990736,0.00003323657,0.0003382131,0.0003925772,0.00007851592,0.00008389794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002720519,0.0002058338,0.9748564,0.0007141501,0.000109541,0.00001152776,0.001951786,0.006842985,0.0001654117,0.00004727681,0.0002090873,0.01485877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001085393,0.0001030324,0.9809478,0.0001505809,0.0001464669,7.253438e-7,0.003194388,0.01372523,0.00005831831,0.00007171069,0.0003616805,0.0001546706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9780123,0.00004462435,0.00008859541,0.0001556992,0.00004906681,0.0008715487,0.00002743987,0.000004072579,0.02074661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967027,0.001043181,0.001734192,0.00001302404,0.000003186911,0.000001268208,0.00002969504,0.000005401495,0.000467331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02027927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04522587652624978,"score_gpt":0.2615272616197676,"score_spread":0.2163013850935178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}