{"id":"W1522288658","doi":"10.5430/ijfr.v6n3p78","title":"Auditing Subsequent Events from the Perspective of Auditors: Study from Jordan","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Financial Research","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Accounting; Sample (material); Operational auditing; Business; Generally Accepted Auditing Standards; Walk-through test; Population; Test (biology); Perspective (graphical); Compliance (psychology); Internal audit; Psychology; External auditor; Joint audit; Medicine; Computer science; Environmental health; Accounting information system; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002708051,0.0003116493,0.0004567814,0.001434252,0.002679958,0.002699471,0.0004969136,0.0007942395,0.001801078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004804105,0.0005237318,0.0002883782,0.002208352,0.0009154145,0.001410085,0.001093243,0.001063496,0.0004030744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001744584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003635116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01002209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02002404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983649,0.0005887698,0.0001543978,0.0001132189,0.0003528065,0.000425976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994214,0.001153924,0.001886186,0.0001892689,0.00148966,0.001066876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002617225,0.002576381,0.6577118,0.0003657048,0.00002238977,0.004868276,0.3027844,0.0001479276,0.001575461,0.000672643,0.001751495,0.02726176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002989839,0.0008679818,0.3123218,0.0002449421,0.0000260308,0.00305164,0.6700797,0.0002996486,0.0006833698,0.0001626801,0.01219478,0.00003760731],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989692,0.0001029866,0.00005165623,0.0001053792,0.000002595528,0.00003066734,0.00001476597,8.497485e-7,0.0007218524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974377,0.0006964378,0.0001877714,0.0003025522,0.0000203133,0.00004038376,0.00003942134,0.000002626216,0.001272775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01002209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01992756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05843751107509046,"score_gpt":0.349440306354296,"score_spread":0.2910027952792055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}