{"id":"W1524747256","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i4.4107","title":"Evidential Modals at the Semantic-Argumentative Interface: Appearance Verbs as Indicators of Defeasible Argumentation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Evidentiality; Argumentation theory; Defeasible estate; Linguistics; Modal verb; Meaning (existential); Defeasible reasoning; Epistemology; Computer science; Value (mathematics); Epistemic modality; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Verb","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004796008,0.0001483868,0.0001893888,0.0001224426,0.0001352011,0.00003271739,0.0002385191,0.00009608235,0.002441762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006737623,0.0001023875,0.000101742,0.0002341528,0.0001821337,0.0002785742,0.0000894948,0.0001457679,0.002054353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003344586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001728233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001898505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002887768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987113,0.0001739781,0.0003848635,0.0001804948,0.0002850455,0.0002642962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992145,0.00009054844,0.0003330784,0.0002567087,0.00005414768,0.00005105893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006486392,0.001273175,0.07199776,0.0006598083,0.002081217,0.00004547222,0.2068027,0.0009497522,0.02724438,0.321153,0.0100063,0.3513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01443876,0.005101659,0.4208203,0.000531306,0.001038283,0.0002884224,0.05867584,0.0006254931,0.4394118,0.0345635,0.02255389,0.001950758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8959846,0.0003799958,0.002929223,0.00008353851,0.0005111432,0.0003536234,0.00001179351,0.00003824489,0.0997078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969668,0.00002193567,0.00005534417,0.0008443698,0.00008168367,0.00006290895,0.00003083949,0.00001076405,0.001925387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4121674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987227,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01780835621906262,"score_gpt":0.3236733954009673,"score_spread":0.3058650391819047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}