{"id":"W1525311651","doi":"10.1002/wsb.530","title":"A mist‐net method for capturing harlequin ducks on rivers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Society Bulletin","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Stantec (Canada); Parks Canada","funders":"","keywords":"STREAMS; Mist; Fishery; Environmental science; Wildlife; Ecology; Foraging; Geography; Biology; Computer science; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007347882,0.0004495487,0.0003017189,0.001618714,0.0005803674,0.0002979443,0.0007553423,0.0004317955,0.002245048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000744164,0.0003011097,0.0002980769,0.000538259,0.0002033614,0.0004337125,0.0003268793,0.000241856,0.0009754164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003614687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003891466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007335302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03976782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999231,0.0001554347,0.00008128415,0.0002860962,0.0001990715,0.0000472413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989262,0.0001457672,0.0003297256,0.00008138951,0.0004095972,0.0001072574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003338902,0.0002605846,0.755087,0.000503152,0.0001207579,0.0008381126,0.001277139,0.0008473877,0.07954927,0.0001961187,0.004790609,0.1561961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004012972,0.0006916287,0.9756497,0.0001225995,0.000108972,0.001762854,0.0006897478,0.004312515,0.01053657,0.00005776427,0.00597828,0.00004926766],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.9431847,0.001170859,0.03917282,0.0001193155,0.0002697432,0.001362089,0.003473242,0.0003647939,0.01088251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8452126,0.0006356686,0.1428182,0.0002975049,0.0001050989,0.001760874,0.002037813,0.00005042678,0.007081786],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007335302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0145852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02514514484145703,"score_gpt":0.2702542735379287,"score_spread":0.2451091286964717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}