{"id":"W1526201865","doi":"10.1007/s11166-017-9264-0","title":"Learning-by-doing in an ambiguous environment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ambiguity; Ambiguity aversion; Expected utility hypothesis; Session (web analytics); Measure (data warehouse); Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Actuarial science; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematical economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00360211,0.0001020872,0.0003280801,0.0001613523,0.0003827419,0.0006493182,0.0006338208,0.0000692341,0.0001012992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001347147,0.00006863637,0.00009276199,0.00003652658,0.0001185126,0.0005832857,0.0001124653,0.0004019983,0.0000240839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005681628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003354131,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003460546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001397263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998316,0.0001642853,0.0006673234,0.0002166897,0.0004726512,0.0001630417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979427,0.0002596025,0.001192289,0.0003698973,0.00007500661,0.0001604945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006793378,0.00005611431,0.1335334,2.63074e-7,0.000002355965,0.00003243983,0.0004583581,0.005604411,0.00009180916,0.000004670787,0.0002489535,0.8598993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002721157,0.001552818,0.7710925,0.00009677475,0.0000538022,0.0001602126,0.005723015,0.01064168,0.0001244565,0.05906568,0.148313,0.0004548983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985653,0.000235498,0.0005091819,0.0001741552,0.0002590998,0.00002844545,0.000006071157,0.000002501839,0.0002198135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984187,0.000693746,0.0006354394,0.00002691598,0.0000832398,3.478901e-7,3.489589e-7,0.000006049126,0.0001351873],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8594444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6261391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05447298923000997,"score_gpt":0.366967090401454,"score_spread":0.312494101171444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}