{"id":"W1526201865","doi":"10.1007/s11166-017-9264-0","title":"Learning-by-doing in an ambiguous environment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ambiguity; Ambiguity aversion; Expected utility hypothesis; Session (web analytics); Measure (data warehouse); Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Actuarial science; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematical economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003555709,0.0004592529,0.0008263541,0.0004324733,0.0007079404,0.002223453,0.0007665166,0.002456133,0.003699473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0165711,0.0003446392,0.0004566919,0.0003959691,0.00258319,0.00300763,0.001346842,0.001425339,0.0002600768],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006734472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000928193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001802705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001722434,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982863,0.001028139,0.00007131586,0.0002296775,0.0001461184,0.0002384497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751881,0.02054163,0.001713132,0.0009102394,0.0004009959,0.001246034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001269498,0.001212998,0.01535367,0.0002946619,0.0002956318,0.001489959,0.001587144,0.3592955,0.003416673,0.5492495,0.002452831,0.06408186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013507,0.0002828243,0.003129494,0.00002930957,0.00005531679,0.0001444311,0.0005948565,0.3013327,0.0005716063,0.6927716,0.0009044656,0.00004827265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8678303,0.0003673217,0.1025127,0.003718531,0.00009637404,0.00006659979,0.00008906921,0.00007154381,0.02524754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943558,0.0001344505,0.004159184,0.00004998027,0.00002779588,0.000013142,0.00001100179,0.000005796223,0.001242881],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003699473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01880467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05447298923000997,"score_gpt":0.366967090401454,"score_spread":0.312494101171444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}