{"id":"W1526980826","doi":"","title":"THE REAL CASE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW: A PLEA FOR NON- INSTRUMENTALIST JUSTIFICATION IN CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Judicial review; Grievance; Law and economics; Political science; Judicial deference; Democracy; Plea; Law; Constitutional theory; Judicial activism; Deference; Constitution; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1035552,0.000570862,0.001668534,0.003068551,0.007540733,0.01617226,0.004063563,0.02900491,0.005629804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1356926,0.0007859617,0.001559865,0.001574929,0.06537396,0.02300078,0.006217879,0.02431683,0.001254362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008863158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0111965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00213091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002176889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9180167,0.05265446,0.00253804,0.007190927,0.01609516,0.003504635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7973189,0.1703759,0.007228251,0.01195078,0.009751557,0.003374636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006017895,0.000009464464,0.00006746967,0.0000318018,0.000004917489,0.00003418395,0.0001681441,0.0001218088,0.00002476132,0.9954481,0.0027226,0.001360641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005707707,0.0000182735,0.0001149331,0.000164125,0.000005820301,0.00006249099,0.0001574437,0.0006475338,0.00006544511,0.9607534,0.03793209,0.00002122529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009675791,0.01525772,0.05740433,0.7857872,0.003465741,0.0001228167,0.00005320035,0.00008348656,0.1281498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7524593,0.008175056,0.03369538,0.1688475,0.01541715,0.0009076789,0.00006763268,0.0001723333,0.020258],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1035552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5476587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0191650395728849,"score_gpt":0.327045633449607,"score_spread":0.3078805938767221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}