{"id":"W1527035681","doi":"","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL PRECEDENTS IN JAPAN: A COMMENT ON THE ROLE OF PRECEDENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Adjudication; Original jurisdiction; Precedent; Statute; Majority opinion; Judicial independence; De facto","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007866098,0.0003914411,0.0006883328,0.0009761089,0.01290888,0.005491535,0.002717865,0.01573174,0.003411402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01205433,0.0006665374,0.001289952,0.002097679,0.01947439,0.008658418,0.003651196,0.01485565,0.000484245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01202768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01338274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1310726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1728711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962135,0.0008992526,0.0003665341,0.0007359963,0.0009600424,0.000824679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899868,0.006646168,0.0008014038,0.0004706775,0.001626192,0.0004687526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000201688,0.00001154335,0.000832984,0.0001204714,0.000008876714,0.0007017921,0.008474692,0.0001555469,0.000338711,0.9527927,0.03347257,0.003069873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001193336,0.00007830618,0.01100516,0.00078653,0.0001372235,0.0006716127,0.01212697,0.0007961001,0.001123325,0.2040602,0.7689208,0.0001744585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.04214719,0.01850008,0.004523852,0.7237505,0.004049638,0.00005192169,0.0002211571,0.00007785677,0.2066779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5895634,0.01250083,0.003466555,0.3497722,0.008340159,0.000151532,0.0001466625,0.0001204245,0.03593827],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1310726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2606193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05579090930302513,"score_gpt":0.2793036715084343,"score_spread":0.2235127622054092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}