{"id":"W1528132648","doi":"10.1108/19348830810915541","title":"Asymmetry, heterogeneity and inter‐firm relationships","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of organizational analysis","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transaction cost; Industrial organization; Categorization; Perspective (graphical); Originality; Value (mathematics); Economics; Asymmetry; Conceptual framework; Resource (disambiguation); Information asymmetry; Resource-based view; Framing (construction); Microeconomics; Computer science; Management; Sociology; Competitive advantage","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003447892,0.0001167948,0.0002046773,0.001258614,0.0001949472,0.0001527665,0.0002792991,0.00006333383,0.0003756392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004791635,0.0001045953,0.0001158809,0.001993428,0.00007684301,0.001452418,0.00008793566,0.0001733043,0.00004241675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004716539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004812959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005262463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004619411,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986845,0.00001598066,0.0005482874,0.0001393407,0.000521982,0.0000899057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965441,0.0000534615,0.0006127983,0.00007844057,0.002695331,0.00001591207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003762711,0.0000912602,0.9661611,0.000005923294,0.00105753,0.00003463135,0.00002957089,0.00104078,0.0002580671,0.03011247,0.0008783378,0.0002927055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004688108,0.000008364342,0.9856614,0.00001481591,0.0004062456,0.000164078,0.00006016541,0.004071207,0.000164966,0.00351382,0.005307365,0.0001587982],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9531748,0.0001034143,0.04015891,0.00422653,0.0005243297,0.00003645406,0.000005463286,0.00002461836,0.001745441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970174,0.00004418017,0.0008336164,0.0008298635,0.001089603,6.149261e-7,0.00009773058,0.00001242815,0.00007452421],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0438426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4265274,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02935532724220446,"score_gpt":0.2401462244734046,"score_spread":0.2107908972312001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}