{"id":"W1528132648","doi":"10.1108/19348830810915541","title":"Asymmetry, heterogeneity and inter‐firm relationships","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of organizational analysis","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transaction cost; Industrial organization; Categorization; Perspective (graphical); Originality; Value (mathematics); Economics; Asymmetry; Conceptual framework; Resource (disambiguation); Information asymmetry; Resource-based view; Framing (construction); Microeconomics; Computer science; Management; Sociology; Competitive advantage","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006874884,0.0003119483,0.0006295359,0.004216365,0.001601122,0.006333145,0.001030315,0.0009744086,0.007573104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02972115,0.0002345838,0.0003822263,0.004346674,0.005488088,0.007291786,0.004252137,0.001152153,0.0004776264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00267951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001425863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001149434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007098199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936363,0.003308483,0.0003885308,0.0004723502,0.001727906,0.000466437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9469818,0.03670219,0.01023522,0.003016643,0.001948916,0.001115247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001509261,0.00009364034,0.04778976,0.0004705304,0.0001352925,0.0005562623,0.005194364,0.005779722,0.0004669068,0.8736485,0.0009289102,0.06478518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002912788,0.00007331755,0.02755656,0.0004289374,0.00009731059,0.0007084237,0.01160121,0.007412564,0.000349214,0.9395667,0.01213604,0.00004056293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7302787,0.01113479,0.05977095,0.006596536,0.0001125993,0.0001725949,0.0002116519,0.00006318196,0.191659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977365,0.0006948864,0.0009096963,0.00007495411,0.00002527987,0.00001692207,0.00002022606,0.000003108436,0.0005185165],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007573104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0363583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02935532724220446,"score_gpt":0.2401462244734046,"score_spread":0.2107908972312001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}