{"id":"W1528964841","doi":"10.1108/jqme-11-2013-0074","title":"A nearly optimal inspection policy for a two-component series system","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Context (archaeology); Component (thermodynamics); Sequence (biology); Series (stratigraphy); Condition-based maintenance; Function (biology); Engineering; Preventive maintenance; Set (abstract data type); Total cost; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00170119,0.0001847897,0.0004255378,0.0003272966,0.00002668787,0.00005769984,0.0001722653,0.00008428272,5.775519e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007648034,0.0001740938,0.0001373496,0.0003694671,0.00002816246,0.0006179694,0.00001812215,0.0002877589,0.000001919386],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001181684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009964041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006356534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001354022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983777,0.00003987804,0.0008616117,0.000120103,0.0002447596,0.0003559546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990859,0.00007851318,0.0001745646,0.0001662407,0.0003465352,0.0001482696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001396636,0.00002322747,0.00008033482,0.0003108671,0.00002842595,0.000009995155,0.001092081,0.9845226,0.002118317,0.01111972,0.0002483945,0.0003063669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002889938,0.000270739,0.001462744,0.0007569852,0.00001864649,0.0003110492,0.003114126,0.9861125,0.001816853,0.0003680222,0.002499199,0.0003791775],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3441975,0.0002235953,0.6530856,0.0005361926,0.001253829,0.0002764358,0.000009402721,0.000216865,0.0002005369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629951,0.00004628184,0.03636224,0.00001850417,0.0004858862,0.0000264493,0.000002402486,0.00003770542,0.00002545004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6187976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7099341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01992058964451253,"score_gpt":0.2705174799166515,"score_spread":0.250596890272139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}