{"id":"W1528964841","doi":"10.1108/jqme-11-2013-0074","title":"A nearly optimal inspection policy for a two-component series system","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Context (archaeology); Component (thermodynamics); Sequence (biology); Series (stratigraphy); Condition-based maintenance; Function (biology); Engineering; Preventive maintenance; Set (abstract data type); Total cost; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008615296,0.0007431152,0.0008311523,0.0007646938,0.0003908424,0.000804071,0.0005589763,0.0007494547,0.001491436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002286065,0.0004265448,0.0005056809,0.0003689646,0.000620582,0.0006187691,0.0004386787,0.0006396896,0.000177029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001308959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001284837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004145757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002805413,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994851,0.0001240672,0.0000254017,0.0001333415,0.0001302688,0.0001018702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988857,0.000466806,0.0003018531,0.00007177288,0.0001889338,0.00008486021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001666991,0.00008413423,0.0010623,0.00008691793,0.00002211847,0.0001125118,0.00004806793,0.9698359,0.01023014,0.003662907,0.0002896864,0.01439866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008793018,0.0001186441,0.0004632908,0.000005519138,0.00001114971,0.00003975697,0.00001495884,0.996405,0.001131568,0.001657714,0.0001384659,0.000005167818],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2653454,0.0003306806,0.7297705,0.0002070869,0.0000323392,0.0001315448,0.00008433429,0.0003622083,0.003736048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672911,0.00008899415,0.03139181,0.00002445391,0.00001108205,0.00003866701,0.00004603721,0.00002208443,0.001085876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004145757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009497225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01992058964451253,"score_gpt":0.2705174799166515,"score_spread":0.250596890272139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}