{"id":"W1529320093","doi":"10.26686/ajl.v4i0.1778","title":"Some non-standard interpretations of the axiomatic basis of Leśniewski’s Ontology","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australasian Journal of Logic","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Ontology; Meaning (existential); Functor; Statement (logic); Basis (linear algebra); Mathematics; Semantics (computer science); Constant (computer programming); Axiomatic system; Natural language processing; Epistemology; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Philosophy; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005858793,0.0001098726,0.000365568,0.0001089807,0.0000731625,0.00002806834,0.001618211,0.00005518274,0.00001394156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001148689,0.00005346062,0.0002409854,0.000282493,0.000314477,0.0002417009,0.000114628,0.0001873951,0.00000301355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002762219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001230294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003690439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004135372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985614,0.0001841486,0.0006851547,0.00009201456,0.0002884449,0.0001888817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982681,0.0002430924,0.0008483558,0.0004541784,0.0001580921,0.00002823497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002485452,0.0007951722,0.06637897,0.0004227067,0.000701761,0.0001942215,0.01407967,0.008917671,0.03607179,0.8333808,0.01413675,0.02467197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001319579,0.001243192,0.4373938,0.0004862673,0.0002265613,0.001292888,0.001703031,0.002104786,0.05273726,0.5010588,0.0001829933,0.0002507935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8810266,0.0007134174,0.09862469,0.01607192,0.0009742872,0.000200533,0.000004431965,0.00001696781,0.002367124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918416,0.00001737637,0.007873988,0.00009375823,0.00006366173,0.000001098339,9.297985e-8,0.000003497059,0.0001049495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3710148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3007065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01658101990030346,"score_gpt":0.2585725854186751,"score_spread":0.2419915655183716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}