{"id":"W1529320093","doi":"10.26686/ajl.v4i0.1778","title":"Some non-standard interpretations of the axiomatic basis of Leśniewski’s Ontology","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australasian Journal of Logic","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Ontology; Meaning (existential); Functor; Statement (logic); Basis (linear algebra); Mathematics; Semantics (computer science); Constant (computer programming); Axiomatic system; Natural language processing; Epistemology; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Philosophy; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004627133,0.0007367546,0.0006480622,0.00290792,0.002281704,0.004298167,0.002503913,0.002156266,0.004942957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005048041,0.0005864517,0.001403565,0.00211209,0.01051956,0.01331112,0.003495507,0.004123992,0.0007120757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003353205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001692906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003055197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003006882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976198,0.000774153,0.0002345689,0.0003641493,0.0007438144,0.000263628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982647,0.0005775435,0.0001959763,0.0003438802,0.0004918051,0.0001260823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002993928,0.000004030746,0.0000225077,0.000007947435,0.000001452086,0.00002032366,0.0002023472,0.00008503678,0.00007781884,0.9985013,0.0003795722,0.0006946601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005515755,0.000003692382,0.00006754993,0.00001152953,0.000003588407,0.00002352851,0.00007088881,0.001020966,0.0001788765,0.991964,0.00664216,0.000007754885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05565464,0.002651423,0.7515208,0.02301094,0.00103929,0.000140219,0.0007044438,0.0004895438,0.1647888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7187645,0.001744281,0.2505471,0.004130052,0.0008849688,0.0004196842,0.0006700768,0.0002191383,0.02262012],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004942957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02447093,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01658101990030346,"score_gpt":0.2585725854186751,"score_spread":0.2419915655183716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}