{"id":"W1529545266","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2010v35n4a2331","title":"Way to Play: Analyzing Gambling Ads for Their Appeal to Underage Youth","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Lottery; Corporation; Advertising; Dream; Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; Media studies; Psychology; Political science; Law; Business; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001338334,0.0002920748,0.0002676453,0.00408214,0.002377961,0.003000148,0.0003699947,0.000369292,0.001793517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005072663,0.0001663265,0.000159629,0.003139987,0.001823804,0.001292587,0.001314864,0.0006726041,0.000145664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004512122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002620388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1109148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.239744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989133,0.0004511164,0.0000413341,0.00007512987,0.0003348984,0.0001843121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961765,0.002453941,0.0004462118,0.00007643865,0.0006496046,0.0001974294],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006290092,0.00003607001,0.03703395,0.0001968653,0.000007898105,0.0004298039,0.9416379,0.0000325619,0.001754821,0.001706355,0.0008539852,0.0162468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003688777,0.00002271488,0.06551076,0.0001508973,0.00001627315,0.0002497356,0.9159512,0.0001793632,0.0008713039,0.000296912,0.0167278,0.00001926967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890664,0.0002468271,0.0004334949,0.0001805352,0.00001487239,0.00006084755,0.000363993,0.00001110074,0.009621924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960209,0.0003011941,0.0007529064,0.00009981125,0.00001088683,0.00006034894,0.0002044285,0.00001610665,0.002533396],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1109148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2205383,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1273224893229713,"score_gpt":0.3158239119526524,"score_spread":0.188501422629681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}