{"id":"W1529610850","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14639697.v1","title":"Analyzing the Usability of an Argumentation Map as a Participatory Spatial Decision Support Tool","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Geographic Information Systems Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Usability; Argumentation theory; Learnability; Computer science; Interactivity; Human–computer interaction; Usability engineering; Context (archaeology); Field (mathematics); Decision support system; Knowledge management; Data science; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02023779,0.0007725309,0.0005178144,0.002333166,0.00133658,0.0038551,0.001273217,0.001251053,0.001480206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08920769,0.000427632,0.0005353288,0.001776102,0.001242297,0.002922058,0.002166954,0.0006195932,0.0002964315],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008080539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001016967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001927147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001968595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.979098,0.01626748,0.0009634785,0.0007088781,0.002436441,0.0005257189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8510197,0.1355629,0.002182237,0.004146239,0.006137719,0.0009511876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004974435,0.003558188,0.1376333,0.005404922,0.0005122171,0.003994452,0.3335937,0.01499865,0.05664053,0.006131457,0.0035805,0.4289777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001556678,0.02977571,0.3833503,0.002005182,0.001362512,0.004058275,0.2881818,0.1483895,0.06646609,0.01164472,0.06223435,0.0009750807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872856,0.00005534198,0.009877752,0.00009288097,0.00001392968,0.0002782691,0.00006064834,0.0001597682,0.002175926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806538,0.0000527161,0.01833926,0.00002163605,0.000008410495,0.0002734241,0.0001239008,0.00005164646,0.0004750632],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02023779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0429608670268978,"score_gpt":0.363268635969713,"score_spread":0.3203077689428153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}