{"id":"W1529657313","doi":"10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00414.x","title":"Carbon Footprint Assessment of a Paperback Book","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon footprint; Greenhouse gas; Mill; Tonne; Paper mill; Pulp (tooth); Paper production; Kraft process; Reuse; Pulp mill; Environmental science; Pulp and paper industry; Waste management; Pulpwood; Paper machine; Carbon dioxide equivalent; Carbon dioxide; Kraft paper; Engineering; Effluent; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001143933,0.0001061878,0.0003127965,0.00002986589,0.00003240443,0.000004715809,0.0001903428,0.0001864648,0.002285045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001879517,0.00008446211,0.0001201925,0.0000914882,0.0002267017,0.000135776,0.0001653281,0.0003875036,0.000006626105],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008078403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006768371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000730633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001642678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985716,0.0001935446,0.0005560969,0.00008156821,0.0002725969,0.0003246327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990398,0.0001081982,0.0004882691,0.0001463269,0.00001068888,0.0002067694],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006042953,0.0004146531,0.9877258,0.000002714205,0.00002946684,0.000007171137,0.0001510595,0.0002837915,0.006134646,0.00004626036,0.0005513926,0.004592643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001245172,0.0009805483,0.9778007,0.000006950111,0.00004713606,0.00006773898,0.0003959291,0.0000255562,0.003692834,0.0001416539,0.01548718,0.0001086437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862601,0.00006109862,0.000006626184,0.0004234431,0.0005637793,0.0001493345,9.203857e-7,0.00000252693,0.01253223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990132,0.00003537109,0.0003568534,0.0001117014,0.0002580023,0.000002254498,2.913393e-7,0.00000729811,0.000214981],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01493579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998627,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02208950500230716,"score_gpt":0.2822019482014574,"score_spread":0.2601124431991503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}