{"id":"W1529770697","doi":"","title":"PROFILE OF MENDANHA CITY NATURAL PARK VISITORS, RIO DE JANEIRO COUNTY – RJ","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Environmental Sustainability and Education","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Recreation; Geography; Quarter (Canadian coin); Natural park; Work (physics); Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Natural (archaeology); Forestry; Socioeconomics; Archaeology; Ecology; Sociology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001620217,0.00008934091,0.0001079684,0.000545599,0.0005348978,0.0004088666,0.0001970461,0.0001858302,0.001714994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004805253,0.0001252601,0.0001379353,0.0004667548,0.0002329903,0.0001729,0.000384904,0.0001053595,0.0003118145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002997309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002625798,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02435884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06589478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998701,0.00003118122,0.000009278109,0.00001799307,0.00003200061,0.00003945128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999855,0.00001961211,0.00003623258,0.00000896038,0.000027579,0.00005258564],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008110036,0.00006624018,0.9566902,0.0001093344,0.00002222955,0.001459236,0.02445481,0.0000712093,0.002747555,0.0001517121,0.0008625863,0.01328371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001838252,0.000093592,0.9551281,0.00002029663,0.000008410278,0.001701098,0.03776682,0.00005286521,0.0001612377,0.00001530893,0.005040758,0.000009813948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984593,0.00009084409,0.00002063847,0.00003209451,0.000002087835,0.00001722635,0.0001607549,0.000001756644,0.001215281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978276,0.0002157469,0.0001078003,0.00002139537,0.000001905378,0.00002795173,0.0001580635,0.000001995585,0.001637561],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02435884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04843414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009406229672751433,"score_gpt":0.2241944529224856,"score_spread":0.2147882232497342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}