{"id":"W1529770697","doi":"","title":"PROFILE OF MENDANHA CITY NATURAL PARK VISITORS, RIO DE JANEIRO COUNTY – RJ","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Environmental Sustainability and Education","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Recreation; Geography; Quarter (Canadian coin); Natural park; Work (physics); Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Natural (archaeology); Forestry; Socioeconomics; Archaeology; Ecology; Sociology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007047934,0.000353354,0.0003373539,0.0001155246,0.0005503166,0.00008557853,0.0005103776,0.0003220886,0.0004025488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001987805,0.0003463874,0.0001829136,0.0004832813,0.00009965355,0.000544265,0.0002769608,0.0004600281,0.00002863317],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002313618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001998253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006651842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003778171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969099,0.0002872349,0.0006220738,0.0006592163,0.0008044032,0.0007171725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986544,0.0001443299,0.0003457113,0.0005137117,0.00006153603,0.0002802967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008862854,0.006329875,0.3965687,0.0004513364,0.0002092562,0.0001751475,0.005286278,0.003098765,0.1057039,0.4487491,0.0245731,0.007968321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005609854,0.00006250123,0.3640804,0.00003540428,0.0000453717,0.0002183681,0.0004567604,0.0004630838,0.009313936,0.001121553,0.6232293,0.0004124417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.913951,0.0001543103,0.0005888774,0.003655107,0.0005390446,0.0005295926,0.00005343505,0.0001393067,0.08038936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950191,0.00002625676,0.003193843,0.0001077933,0.0003321392,0.0001307585,0.0001981023,0.00003061629,0.0009613521],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5986561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009406229672751433,"score_gpt":0.2241944529224856,"score_spread":0.2147882232497342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}