{"id":"W1530407535","doi":"10.1111/jvs.12294","title":"Describing, explaining and predicting community assembly: a convincing trait‐based case study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vegetation Science","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Trait; Abiotic component; Gradient analysis; Ecology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Vegetation (pathology); Biology; Ordination; Computer science; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006582136,0.00008563432,0.0001548461,0.0001372124,0.0008915706,0.00007903118,0.0002110982,0.00002646724,0.00000640377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001753064,0.00007341466,0.00002299019,0.0004158626,0.0005110675,0.001028148,0.0001297043,0.0003166851,0.000002810009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001898359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001428418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002310291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001203383,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985412,0.0002905701,0.0003833172,0.0001260725,0.0004852852,0.0001735001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987194,0.0003783496,0.0004260431,0.0001054796,0.0001567662,0.0002139481],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001590759,0.0002124056,0.913653,0.000005323676,0.00001228343,0.0003331059,0.05717861,0.0233716,0.002699555,0.00003172692,0.00001399481,0.002472555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002498392,0.001487737,0.6292845,0.0000833193,0.00007632797,0.003480894,0.159642,0.2024476,0.0004371745,0.000323714,0.00001196737,0.0002263892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993286,0.00003192789,0.005341289,0.00009816087,0.0001738851,0.000111352,2.697528e-7,0.00001083198,0.0009462522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956122,8.324623e-7,0.004203665,0.0001534977,0.00001660501,0.000002819098,9.661482e-8,0.00000405953,0.000006248646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2843684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.685733,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09769797011664165,"score_gpt":0.3243145633536973,"score_spread":0.2266165932370557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}