{"id":"W1530477190","doi":"","title":"Pluralism in IR Theory: An Eclectic Study of Diplomatic Apologies and Regrets","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Eclecticism; Epistemology; Pluralism (philosophy); Constructivism (international relations); Causation; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; International relations","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01405415,0.0004647178,0.0007340214,0.003641289,0.00564425,0.007852304,0.002019888,0.002974153,0.002693057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01602966,0.0004349538,0.0008108609,0.001828135,0.04119061,0.01595257,0.006221071,0.005744064,0.0002761318],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005960701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002654424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001155817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008303659,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9857939,0.0104063,0.0003337428,0.0008368513,0.001886036,0.0007432059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872062,0.009766436,0.0009730744,0.0007233076,0.0008843904,0.0004464851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007720845,0.00001416617,0.0001310389,0.00002423068,0.000004043804,0.00007005365,0.01219717,0.0001694577,0.00008129056,0.9850456,0.0002410911,0.002014027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001285082,0.00001301301,0.0002279475,0.00005325866,0.000004127044,0.00010191,0.005923508,0.0012851,0.0001140052,0.982288,0.009966212,0.00001011215],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.200709,0.005889811,0.2934432,0.044898,0.0005408741,0.0001868967,0.00005047401,0.0001657639,0.4541161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804561,0.0005198724,0.01314485,0.0007944962,0.000148009,0.00006709846,0.00001247671,0.00004768305,0.004809307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01405415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07432634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01553187788127927,"score_gpt":0.3424965377347058,"score_spread":0.3269646598534266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}