{"id":"W1531542708","doi":"","title":"Seeking an Islamic Reflective Equilibrium: A Response to Abdallahi A. An-Na'im's Complementary, Not Competing, Claims of Law and Religion: An Islamic Perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Reflective equilibrium; Normative; Economic Justice; Political science; Politics; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Lawmaking; State (computer science); Sociology; Sharia; Secular state; Separation of church and state; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01454252,0.0007253782,0.001062926,0.0008151124,0.01793244,0.01270344,0.004098864,0.02739257,0.002800384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01632563,0.0005104871,0.0008201895,0.001132347,0.02981078,0.0127994,0.008034564,0.0532639,0.0007671465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007081432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006890927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006422806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01083449,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9881004,0.007251855,0.0003588551,0.001093379,0.001806486,0.001389046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890322,0.006939362,0.0008852725,0.0003188685,0.001596501,0.001227802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004580952,0.0001088925,0.0005828415,0.00009134968,0.00001448331,0.001112136,0.04314393,0.0002000071,0.0003704626,0.6886696,0.2562309,0.009429619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006044153,0.00007030242,0.0007522964,0.0005485337,0.00001623146,0.0009185054,0.06957654,0.001152098,0.0004530738,0.2919643,0.6343681,0.0001195969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002629989,0.003049525,0.0004432844,0.9818456,0.004102562,0.000009350567,0.000005399897,0.00000987986,0.007904468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1157725,0.003942962,0.001623249,0.8597221,0.00741714,0.0000533023,0.000009579267,0.00004026962,0.01141891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02739257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07690912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02254154811229264,"score_gpt":0.3498989469250777,"score_spread":0.327357398812785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}