{"id":"W1531584233","doi":"","title":"Digital forensics on a shoestring: a case study from the University of Victoria","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Digital and Cyber Forensics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital forensics; Art; Computer graphics (images); Computer science; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005675108,0.0002387893,0.0004756064,0.0001692162,0.0001856521,0.001750498,0.004378977,0.00005630889,0.00009001627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001746488,0.0001790672,0.0001542969,0.0009289496,0.0001758193,0.003851896,0.002463373,0.000265115,0.00001669507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008149313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002313268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00210266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002615382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979612,0.000126102,0.000425209,0.0004066065,0.0008218773,0.0002589578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975322,0.0004052493,0.0005041225,0.0008605316,0.0004049299,0.0002929697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003728434,0.001734938,0.6976747,0.0000158533,0.0006049591,0.004721317,0.008297342,0.0004773591,0.0002367743,0.003280255,0.06821395,0.2143697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00891622,0.0008484304,0.6855512,0.00101749,0.000498882,0.001009422,0.02278273,0.003208816,0.005539221,0.1818199,0.08595058,0.002857113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834216,0.0005553447,0.003407203,0.0001231713,0.0007752419,0.0003794837,0.00007708173,0.00004297654,0.01121796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992756,0.0000582312,0.0002716689,0.00008294553,0.00009854888,0.000001290378,0.000004038057,0.00001520384,0.0001924915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2115126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2436303477653464,"score_gpt":0.4632964417625021,"score_spread":0.2196660939971558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}