{"id":"W1531647055","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.0909.5677","title":"Beyond Equilibria: Mechanisms for Repeated Combinatorial Auctions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ArXiv.org","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Combinatorial auction; Regret; Common value auction; Bidding; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mechanism design; Class (philosophy); Auction algorithm; Focus (optics); Space (punctuation); Reduction (mathematics); Auction theory; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Revenue equivalence; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Machine learning; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00833687,0.001475907,0.002287198,0.00106254,0.001111358,0.004630476,0.004960325,0.003946657,0.006127713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04295573,0.001215575,0.001801796,0.00157796,0.002879007,0.008661591,0.002853603,0.004729009,0.001108749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002129006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001688352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000705693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004782373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933131,0.004252146,0.0002474168,0.0008398637,0.0008138142,0.000533659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801069,0.01342415,0.002477952,0.002170072,0.00106759,0.000753373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002053594,0.0002578761,0.0006554134,0.0002407423,0.0001560935,0.0001257279,0.0002649135,0.233016,0.001728658,0.7347885,0.001873829,0.02668687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001325161,0.0001570088,0.00008770994,0.00003934035,0.0000328906,0.00009340879,0.00004781485,0.4929436,0.0007038728,0.5030336,0.00270362,0.00002458065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02040642,0.0004364209,0.9737368,0.00063032,0.00006715985,0.0001758968,0.00003794763,0.0001672421,0.004341823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6241089,0.0009210838,0.3631127,0.0004629857,0.0002383358,0.0008612762,0.0001071619,0.000194679,0.009993003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00833687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04409009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1413526886858169,"score_gpt":0.3949556615346037,"score_spread":0.2536029728487867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}