{"id":"W1531664550","doi":"10.17821/srels/2012/v49i2/44089","title":"RESEARCH TRENDS IN INFORMATION LITERACY: A BIBLIOMETRIC STUDY","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Presentation (obstetrics); Information literacy; Field (mathematics); Library science; Computer science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Literacy; Trend analysis; Data science; Regional science; Information retrieval; Sociology; Political science; History; Law; Mathematics; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003043226,0.00008552823,0.0001661449,0.02435048,0.001880985,0.0003635874,0.0007057914,0.00009855561,0.0003653382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001131113,0.00009835693,0.00007247111,0.07099736,0.0002982924,0.02429937,0.0002299419,0.0002318573,0.0000520199],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000208654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002212217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007128449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003688596,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976764,0.0002509475,0.0003412627,0.0001628522,0.001157369,0.0004112222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987695,0.0001930554,0.0002180397,0.0002255229,0.0004254148,0.0001685285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002194729,0.0007138422,0.1635299,0.00002681639,0.00002741632,0.00006663857,0.6085275,0.0000217178,0.0001101295,0.004794706,0.01623125,0.2057306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004573905,0.000249966,0.5039234,0.00001583317,0.000003057801,0.000001751873,0.2003309,0.0000873571,0.00003675689,0.00003111588,0.2947529,0.0001096677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8268312,0.0000476596,0.0001060299,0.0004486498,0.0002032151,0.000193553,0.00000264853,0.00005263529,0.1721144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898077,0.0000333785,0.0004623415,0.00007257606,0.00006315708,4.044672e-7,0.0000120042,0.000002604288,0.009545803],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4081966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03577464964895556,"score_gpt":0.3377761719587331,"score_spread":0.3020015223097775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}