{"id":"W1531664550","doi":"10.17821/srels/2012/v49i2/44089","title":"RESEARCH TRENDS IN INFORMATION LITERACY: A BIBLIOMETRIC STUDY","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Presentation (obstetrics); Information literacy; Field (mathematics); Library science; Computer science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Literacy; Trend analysis; Data science; Regional science; Information retrieval; Sociology; Political science; History; Law; Mathematics; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006649542,0.0002897423,0.0009144633,0.08189047,0.0009627215,0.003904367,0.0006048008,0.0007792598,0.001965222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04013497,0.0002356354,0.0008301226,0.1681433,0.0009677122,0.005766381,0.002296096,0.000504549,0.0006647799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001619875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002314918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002360065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00296327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907687,0.002109526,0.002072687,0.000533179,0.003997093,0.0005188425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9379534,0.0376665,0.01121625,0.001691058,0.01035488,0.001117852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001806827,0.0002857349,0.8023363,0.002182851,0.0003124811,0.0005101357,0.01148476,0.0005558585,0.001110225,0.006656173,0.004044892,0.1703398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001302505,0.0002075763,0.9571929,0.0005627615,0.0001951977,0.001094206,0.01207304,0.001880456,0.0008531573,0.001421599,0.02445983,0.00004621069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9506746,0.008388889,0.002326909,0.002354015,0.00007298172,0.0002477596,0.006239613,0.0001142996,0.02958103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820665,0.007836472,0.002924935,0.0001408839,0.0003406472,0.000209861,0.00482398,0.00003832774,0.00161822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9181095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03516656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03577464964895556,"score_gpt":0.3377761719587331,"score_spread":0.3020015223097775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}