{"id":"W1532293032","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2010.11928577","title":"Usefulness of 64-Slice Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in the Planning of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","topic":"Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Percutaneous coronary intervention; Computed tomographic angiography; Medicine; Coronary angiography; Computed tomographic; Radiology; Computed tomography; Percutaneous; Angiography; Nuclear medicine; Cardiology; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004752143,0.0001408787,0.0003325858,0.0004480929,0.00005530451,0.000007881845,0.0003054446,0.0001621218,0.00006902224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000231452,0.0001202759,0.0003747164,0.0006851511,0.0004286465,0.0001092254,0.0001265575,0.0005737526,0.00000131649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000209053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004560914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001468137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001937359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986334,0.00003203197,0.0002724759,0.0002287004,0.0006084488,0.0002249861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991156,0.0002240609,0.0001401029,0.0001336174,0.000227535,0.0001590807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005109957,0.0007621416,0.9913223,0.0003041525,0.0001050695,0.0006413441,0.00219403,5.589761e-7,0.0007579816,0.0004061821,0.00128796,0.001707224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002903035,0.0003607312,0.9857395,0.0007977844,0.0001911623,0.002007456,0.00589529,0.0003139825,0.0001887973,0.00003060009,0.001437164,0.0001345331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970585,0.0001036021,0.0001645644,0.0005933811,0.0002367615,0.0002642631,0.00002481511,0.00004285706,0.001511271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993744,0.00001569838,0.0002660663,0.0002123283,0.00006216064,7.372141e-7,0.00004387376,0.00001094526,0.0000137602],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005582896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4904711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01174205154903039,"score_gpt":0.2362879701397456,"score_spread":0.2245459185907152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}