{"id":"W1532328465","doi":"10.1506/pfg3-ghnh-yhkb-upwn","title":"Commentary: Accounting Schism or Synthesis? A Challenge for the Conditional‐Normative Approach*","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Accounting Perspectives","topic":"Accounting and Organizational Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Schism; Normative; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Marxist philosophy; Accounting; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Statistics; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008217887,0.0004563118,0.0003603714,0.0006964526,0.002447126,0.001362833,0.0008974789,0.0001312056,0.001774321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001374884,0.0003535381,0.0001846061,0.0009740968,0.0002702903,0.002264921,0.0001839198,0.0003308206,0.0004493774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004747385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007403492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01766394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01456863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974836,0.00002279808,0.0004440836,0.0006776387,0.0004894788,0.0008824337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977984,0.0006243485,0.0004268823,0.0004612661,0.0006315198,0.00005760623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007403032,0.0004280353,0.009165364,0.0005425312,0.0008243541,0.00002213889,0.004983021,0.0008688623,0.00001315651,0.3268619,0.6496732,0.00654343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001258156,0.00002206511,0.01521331,0.0001567029,0.0004843438,0.00001561157,0.05063459,0.07996999,0.000007715644,0.004246033,0.8466895,0.001302041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04603544,0.008922989,0.02278925,0.4531504,0.004023232,0.01069312,0.0007050189,0.002433416,0.4512472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732975,0.0000724545,0.0006905496,0.02047484,0.004177796,0.0004303916,0.0000900654,0.0001172909,0.0006491574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.927262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0265786361797192,"score_gpt":0.21085948832054,"score_spread":0.1842808521408208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}